Skip to main content
Dryad

Data and code from: Coexisting ant species differ in ability to meet their intrinsic nutritional needs

Data files

Jul 13, 2026 version files 843.89 KB

Click names to download individual files

Abstract

Coexisting species are often assumed to reduce competition by foraging for different foods with different nutrients. Few studies have examined whether this nutritional partitioning reflects innate differences in nutritional needs. Here, we tested for overlapping estimates of nutritional intake (tissue isotopes: δ15N, elemental ratios: C:N) among 17 co-occurring Australian ant species collected from the field. We then measured the innate nutritional selectivity (protein:carbohydrate intake targets: P:C IT) of these ant species with competition-free lab feeding experiments. By comparing the nutritional ecology of free-ranging and lab-maintained ants, we inferred whether extrinsic factors prevent ant species from foraging nutritionally optimized diets. Analyses of free-ranging ants indicated dietary and nutritional partitioning, with worker δ15N (proxy for realised intake) spanning 7.1 ‰ among species and C:N (proxy for realised intake) varying 1.33-fold. Lab-maintained ants, by contrast, exhibited overlapping P:C ITs (innate selectivity), with a mean of 1.00 (±0.06 SE) and range 0.60–1.42 among species. Lab P:C ITs were not predictive of species-mean δ15N or C:N in the field (H1). This indicates that, despite relatively narrow and overlapping innate macronutrient selectivity, realised field diets diverge widely; pairwise coupling was weak at best (H2; ~5 % variance) and residual/compensatory divergence was unsupported (H3), suggesting nutritional shortfalls under natural constraints (e.g., competitive monopolisation of carbohydrates, brood-mediated demand, risk-sensitive foraging) can decouple innate targets from realised intake. This study illustrates the power and novelty of integrating field-based measures with controlled lab-based experiments to test classic hypotheses in nutritional ecology. Further work will be needed to test whether nutritionally imbalanced diets are physiologically costly for free-ranging ant colonies, and whether population-level costs scale up to impact community-level stability.