Relative cover and leaf economic traits for native and non-native plants across five U.S. ecoregions
Data files
Jun 16, 2025 version files 560.10 MB
-
2origins_LDMC_v3.csv
28.96 MB
-
2origins_leafN_v3.csv
40.20 MB
-
2origins_SLA_v3.csv
47.74 MB
-
dat.LDMC.csv
54.28 MB
-
dat.leafN.csv
110.19 MB
-
dat.SLA.csv
139.09 MB
-
Data_Dictionary_2origins_LDMC_v3.csv
675 B
-
Data_Dictionary_2origins_leafN_v3.csv
680 B
-
Data_Dictionary_2origins_SLA_v3.csv
669 B
-
Data_Dictionary_dat.LDMC.csv
1.13 KB
-
Data_Dictionary_dat.leafN.csv
1.14 KB
-
Data_Dictionary_dat.SLA.csv
1.13 KB
-
Data_Dictionary_painles_cover_2024_1Yr_V2.csv
778 B
-
Data_Dictionary_PAINLES_dat8_region.csv
818 B
-
painles_cover_2024_1Yr_V2.csv
137.99 MB
-
PAINLES_dat8_region.csv
1.64 MB
-
README.md
2.98 KB
Abstract
Are non-native plants abundant because they are non-native, and have advantages over native plants, or because they possess ‘fast’ resource strategies, and have advantages in disturbed environments? This question is central to invasion biology but remains unanswered.
We quantified the relative importance of resource strategy and origin in 69,441 plots across the conterminous United States containing 11,280 plant species.
Non-native species had faster economic traits than native species in most plant communities (77%, 86%, and 82% of plots for leaf nitrogen concentration, specific leaf area, and leaf dry matter content). Non-native species also had distinct patterns of abundance, but these were not explained by their fast traits. Compared to functionally similar native species, non-native species (1) were more abundant in plains and deserts, indicating the importance of biogeographical origin, and less abundant in forested ecoregions, (2) were more abundant where co-occurring species had fast traits, e.g., due to disturbance, and (3) showed weaker signals of local environmental filtering.
These results clarify the nature of plant invasion: Although non-native plants have consistently fast economic traits, other novel characteristics and processes likely explain their abundance and therefore impacts.
Dataset DOI: 10.5061/dryad.rjdfn2zpq
Description of the data and file structure:
This dataset contains eight data files, each one accompanied by a separate data dictionary for clarity. The files are available in comma-delimited format. They are a supplement to:
Blumenthal et al. 2025, “Why are non-native plants successful? Consistently fast economic traits and novel origin jointly explain abundance across U.S. ecoregions.” New Phytologist.
Data on plant cover, taxonomy, origin, and growth form were obtained from Petri et al. (2022), and combined with trait data from the TRY database (Kattge et al. 2020) as described in Blumenthal et al. (2025).
Kattge J, Bönisch G, Díaz S, Lavorel S, Prentice IC, Leadley P, Tautenhahn S, Werner GD, Aakala T, Abedi M. et al. 2020. TRY plant trait database–enhanced coverage and open access. Global Change Biology 26(1): 119-188.
Petri L, Beaury EM, Corbin J, Peach K, Sofaer H, Pearse IS, Early R, Barnett DT, Ibáñez I, Peet RK, Schafale M, Wethworth TR, Vanderhorst JP, Zaya DN, Spyreas G, Bradley BA. 2022. SPCIS: Standardized Plant Community with Introduced Status database. Ecology: e3947-e3947.
Missing values are indicated by “na.”
Files and variables:
File: PAINLES_dat8_region.csv
Description: Dataset used for comparing leaf economic traits between native and non-native species at the ecoregion-scale.
File: 2origins_leafN_v3.csv
Description: Dataset used for comparing leaf nitrogen content between native and non-native species at the plot-scale.
File: 2origins_LDMC_v3.csv
Description: Dataset used for comparing leaf dry matter content between native and non-native species at the plot-scale.
File: 2origins_SLA_v3.csv
Description: Dataset used for comparing specific leaf area between native and non-native species at the plot-scale.
File: painles_cover_2024_1Yr_V2.csv
Description: Dataset used for comparing abundance between native and non-native species, not including traits.
File: dat.leafN.csv
Description: Dataset used for comparing abundance between native and non-native species, including leaf nitrogen content of focal species and non-focal communities.
File: dat.LDMC.csv
Description: Dataset used for comparing abundance between native and non-native species, including leaf dry matter content of focal species and non-focal communities.
File: dat.SLA.csv
Description: Dataset used for comparing abundance between native and non-native species, including specific leaf area of focal species and non-focal communities.
Code/software:
Code used in associated analyses, described in Blumenthal et al. (2025), is available at: https://github.com/DiezJ/PAINLES-repository.
Plant cover data were compiled from multiple sources including state and federal land management agencies, which used a variety of methods for measuring plant cover within plots. See Petri et al. (2022) for details on data compilation. Plant growth form data were obtained from the USDA Plants database. Data from the TRY database (https://www.try-db.org/TryWeb/Home.php) included leaf nitrogen content, leaf dry matter content, and specific leaf area, and were averaged to the species level prior to being combined with plant cover datasets.
Code used in associated analyses, described in Blumenthal et al. (2025), is available at: https://github.com/DiezJ/PAINLES-repository.