Data from: Global perspectives, local solutions: Improving human-predator coexistence through collaboration, meaningful experiences and cross-cultural knowledge.
Data files
Apr 02, 2026 version files 23.65 KB
-
Data_Base_availability_review.csv
13.57 KB
-
README.md
10.08 KB
Abstract
This dataset supports the literature review titled “Global perspectives, local solutions: Improving human–predator coexistence through collaboration, meaningful experiences and cross-cultural knowledge”, and compiles data from 76 peer-reviewed articles from 33 countries that address socio-ecological factors influencing human–predator coexistence worldwide. The dataset includes both categorical and numerical variables coded from the literature, covering aspects such as geographic region, focal predator species, study design, stakeholder engagement, gender representation, habitat types, presence of cross-cultural factors, and factors associated with coexistence. Each row represents a distinct study-species (when the distinction was made within the article, we separated the species in different rows), and includes 21 variables capturing key attributes distributed in columns. The dataset enables exploration of spatial and thematic trends in coexistence research and facilitates the analysis of factors contributing to coexistence between humans and predators. It offers reuse potential for researchers conducting global comparisons, investigating patterns in coexistence framing, and exploring the underrepresented nuances of factors associated to predator tolerance under different contexts. Variables are clearly labelled and include a corresponding coding guide for transparency and reproducibility. No original field data were collected for this dataset; all information was extracted from previously published studies, which are cited in supporting information S1 and within the article. Ethical considerations are minimal, as all data were in the public domain at the time of extraction. However, appropriate attribution should be given to both this dataset and the original studies upon reuse.
Dataset DOI: 10.5061/dryad.rr4xgxdks
Description of the data and file structure
A systematic review of 76 peer-reviewed articles from 33 countries examines a range of factors that contribute to human coexistence with predators.
Files and variables
File: Data_Base_availability_review.csv
Description: The dataset includes both categorical and numerical variables coded from the literature, covering aspects such as geographic region, focal predator species, study design, stakeholder engagement, gender representation, habitat types, presence of cross-cultural and factors associated to coexistence. Each row represents a different species (when the distinction was made), with 21 variables capturing key attributes.
Variables
| Code | Description | Value |
|---|---|---|
| id | Unique identifier | id paper - id species |
| author | first author | |
| year | publication year | numeric |
| framing | how does the article frames human predator adaption | (1) coexistence (2) tolerance (3) cohabitation (4) positive (5) acceptance (6) conviviality |
| continent | continent where the study was held | 1: Europe, 2: North America, 3: Central America, 4: South America, 5: Africa, 6: Asia |
| country | study location | |
| animal_group | Family of the studied species | (1) Felidae (2) Canidae (3) Ursidae (4) Raptor (5) Hyaenidae (6) Carnivores |
| Species | scientific name | |
| study area | protected_area/ agricultural_land/ urban mosaic | |
| habitat | type of habitat | (1) mountanious forest (2) tropical rainforest forest (3) grassland (4) wetland (5) artifitial (6) mixed (7) mangrove forest |
| stakeholders | Who/what is the target population | (1) farmer (2) retired (3) citizens/residents (4) eco/tourist workers (5) conservationists (6) foresters (7) other occupation (8) hunters (9) community members/villagers (10) experts (11) children (12) tourists (13) governers |
| cross-cultural | crosscultural approach, working with Traditional Ecological Knowledge, may be indigenous/traditional | yes/ no |
| Human_int | Human interest that is being affected by carnivore presence | (1) livestock predation (2) human safety (3) damage to infrastructure (4) use in traditional medicine |
| focus | Research focus | (1) interdiscipline, mixed methods (2) ethnographic (3) social (4) ecological (5) non-specific |
| design | Research design | Descriptive Experimental |
| type | Type of methology used | quant=Quantitative Survey qual=Qualitiative Survey mixed=Mixed Method syst=Systematic Review/Meta-analysis theoretical participatory |
| method | analysis/criteria used to find the drivers | |
| female | porcentaje of female participation | numeric |
| factors | socio-ecological drivers of tolerance considered in the study | (1) exposure (2) nothing, eliminated (3) value orientations/cultural values/identity (4) kownledge (5) perception of risk (6) main economic activity (7) tangible benefits and costs (8) intangible benefits and costs (9) incentives (10) institutional and community support (11) gender (12) age (13) education |
Note: "NA" cells mean "Not Applicable" or missing data
Code/software
Excel
