Skip to main content
Dryad

Data and code from: Unravelling drivers of forest biodiversity: Contrasting effects of mean environmental conditions, environmental heterogeneity and landscape context

Data files

Nov 05, 2026 version files 4.69 MB

Click names to download individual files

Abstract

Understanding how biodiversity varies under different environmental conditions is one of the central aims of ecology. Increased heterogeneity is generally associated with increased diversity, but dominant conditions tend to have a stronger influence. Site specific conditions are embedded into a landscape context, which adds another layer of complexity to be considered. Due to the rarity of multi-taxon data it remains unclear if resulting patterns of abundance and diversity are similar across taxa. Most European forests are under management and being strongly influenced in both mean conditions and heterogeneity. How different species groups respond to variation in these forest characteristics is therefore crucial for testing ecological theories and designing effective conservation measures. We assessed the effects of environmental conditions on biodiversity of seven taxonomic groups in a temperate mountain forest area in Central Europe. We analysed the responses of biodiversity (species richness, Shannon diversity, and beta diversity) to three groups of environmental variables: local mean conditions (Mean canopy height, elevation, deadwood volume) local heterogeneity (Conifer dominance, gap share, mean slope, structural complexity index, variation of canopy height, Shannon diversity of trees, deadwood diversity), and landscape (Forest cover, Conifers forest share) . Our objectives were to determine which group of variables is most important explaining biodiversity variation, and if environmental conditions have consistent effects on multiple taxonomic groups. One of our findings was that the effects of environmental conditions varied substantially between taxa biodiversity. The proportion of conifers had the largest number of significant effects overall, but the direction varied between taxa. None of the three groups of variables was more relevant in explaining biodiversity. While an increase in local heterogeneity and higher values in the landscape context were associated with increased diversity, an increase in mean conditions was mainly negatively associated with diversity. Synthesis and applications Our results highlight how no single factor affects biodiversity across different taxa in the same way. For management, this means that stand-level interventions, are likely not sufficient to promote the many aspects of biodiversity. Instead, different types of management are likely needed for objective-specific biodiversity conservation at the landscape scale.