Skip to main content
Dryad

Safety of the anterior approach versus the lateral approach for chest tube insertion by residents treating spontaneous pneumothorax: a propensity score weighted analysis

Data files

May 12, 2020 version files 9.37 KB

Click names to download individual files

Abstract

Background: Chest tube malposition is the most common complication during chest tube insertion. This study aimed to compare the risk of chest tube malposition between the anterior and lateral approaches for thoracostomy performed by junior and senior residents.

Methods: This retrospective study included patients aged ≥ 20 years who exhibited primary or secondary spontaneous pneumothorax without pleural adhesion and underwent chest tube drainage performed by junior or senior residents. The study exposure involved the insertion of the chest tube in the midclavicular line (anterior approach) or the anterior or midaxillary line (lateral approach). The primary outcome was the number of malpositioned chest tubes. Multiple imputation was used for missing data. The propensity score within each imputed dataset was calculated by using the collected variables. The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method was used to adjust for baseline confounders.

Results: IPTW analysis revealed that the estimated odds ratio for chest tube malposition in the anterior approach group (n = 34) versus the lateral approach group (n = 219) was 0.61 (95% confidence interval, 0.17–2.11).

Conclusion: In patients treated for primary or secondary pneumothorax by junior or senior residents, the risk of chest tube malposition was not significantly different between the anterior and lateral approach for thoracostomy.