Data from: Impacts of rotation, tillage, cover cropping, and drainage on soil health in soybean-based cropping systems: Evidence from 4–50-year trials across the US
Data files
Sep 24, 2025 version files 144.78 KB
-
README.md
1.30 KB
-
SeveroSilvaEtal_EGEE_Dryad.xlsx
143.48 KB
Abstract
Recent studies highlight conservation management practices as an effective strategy to enhance soil health. However, results vary, particularly regarding which soil health parameters respond most sensitively to these practices. More studies covering a wide range of soil types and climatic conditions are needed to assist farmers in making management decisions on production practices related to soil health. In this study, we collected soil samples (0-15 cm) from 21 (4–50 years) soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]-based cropping systems trials across the United States (US) to assess the impact of management practices on soil health indicators. Soil indicators included wet aggregate stability (WAS), permanganate oxidizable carbon (POXC), organic matter loss-on-ignition (OM-LOI), mineralizable carbon (Min-C), water extractable organic carbon (WEOC), total organic carbon (TOC), soil extractable protein (ACE-N), total nitrogen (TN), pH, soil test phosphorus (STP), and soil test potassium (STK). Our objectives were: (i) to assess the effects of crop rotation, tillage, cover cropping, and artificial drainage on soil health; (ii) to inform soybean farmers about the management practices that are associated with improvements on soil health; and (iii) to develop and share a unique and open soil health dataset with the research community for future global meta-studies. To assess the effects of management practices on soil health indicators, both meta-analysis approach and linear mixed-effect models were used. Two-crop rotations were associated with greater STP values compared to a single-crop. The inclusion of cover crops was associated with greater Min-C and WEOC compared to no cover crops. No-tillage showed more acidic pH than conventional tillage. The remaining soil health indicators tested did not change in response to the management practices assessed. There were no statistically significant differences in observed soil tests between tile-drained and undrained treatments. Overall results suggest that cover crops can play an important role in building soil health in soybean-based cropping systems. Our open-access dataset provides a valuable resource for future research and meta-studies, ultimately contributing to the development of more effective management strategies for promoting more sustainable soybean cropping systems.
Dataset DOI: 10.5061/dryad.v9s4mw787
Description of the data and file structure
This study used soil samples (0–15 cm depth) collected in 2023 from 625 plots across 21 soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]-based cropping systems trials across the United States. The aim of this study was to investigate whether management practices (crop rotation, cover crops, tillage, and artificial drainage) are associated with changes in recommended soil health indicators.
Files and variables
File: SeveroSilvaEtal_EGEE_Dryad.xlsx
Description: This dataset contains two tabs within a single Excel file.
Variables
- readme: Provides descriptions of all variables in the dataset.
- data: Contains plot-level information on agronomic management field histories, soil biological, physical, and chemical measurements from the 21 field trials used in this study.
Code/software
Microsoft Excel or another spreadsheet software is needed to view this data.
Access information
Data was derived from the following sources:
- Generated data in a laboratory
- Web Soil Survey
