Aim

In mountain areas, geographical isolation and history of mountain systems are believed to be among the most important factors which determine population distribution and connectivity. In this study we address the importance of discontinuity among mountain systems for intraspecific genetic structure by investigating whether the geographical disjunction between the Alps and the Carpathians (and the related habitat gap) is the primary factor that shapes the genetic structure of the high-mountain plant populations. We compare the large-scale genetic structure of alpine plants from these two parts of the European Alpine System concerning the location of the main genetic split in the studied species, large-scale patterns of phylogeographical lineages and potential factors influencing their distribution.

Location

The Alps and the Carpathians

Taxon

22 alpine/subalpine vascular plant species

Methods

We performed Bayesian population structure analysis on genome-wide genotyping (AFLP) data and reconstructed relationships between individuals and populations using the PCoA and Neighbour Joining. We also performed AMOVA to estimate the contribution of genetic variation among regions. Based on these analyses, we examined the location of primary and lower-level phylogeographical breaks.

Results

A clear primary genetic split between the Alps and the Carpathians was observed in three species (14% of studied species). In seventeen species (77%) we identified other genetic patterns or, in some cases, we did not observe any geographical pattern (two species, 9%). We found no specific pattern of biological traits that are correlated with genetic split between the Alps and the Carpathians.

Conclusions

The geographical gap between the Alps and the Carpathians is not a primary factor in shaping the genetic structure of the regional high-mountain flora as it aligns with a first-rank phylogeographic break in a minority of species. The genetic division between the Alps and the Carpathians appears mostly at higher K values, showing that internal complexity of these large mountain systems plays a no less important role. Several patterns of large-scale distribution of intraspecific lineages were detected, including connections between the Carpathians and the nearest Eastern Alps but also historical links of the Carpathians with Southern and Western Alps through latitudinally extended genetic groups.

Structure datasets based on AFLP markers from https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.s4q6s with only the species occurring in the Alps and the Carpathians. Datasets for both mountain ranges were merged. In the case of two species (Gypsophila repens and Oreojuncus trifidus), we removed a few outlier individuals (4 and 14 individuals, respectively) based on PCoA, as they likely resulted from genotyping errors.

Original dataset: Taberlet, Pierre; Zimmermann, Niklaus E.; Englisch, Thorsten et al. (2023). Data from: Genetic diversity in widespread species is not congruent with species richness in alpine plant communities [Dataset]. Dryad. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.s4q6s