Developmental plasticity does not improve performance during a species interaction: implications for species turnover
Data files
Nov 28, 2024 version files 35.90 KB
-
ECY24-0158_Data.xlsx
34.66 KB
-
README.md
1.24 KB
Abstract
Species interactions can contribute to species turnover when the outcomes of the interactions are context dependent (e.g. change along environmental gradients). Plasticity may change this dynamic by altering the environmental tolerances of the species interacting. Here, we explored how the competitive interaction between two euryhaline fish, Poecilia reticulata and Poecilia picta, is influenced by acute and developmental responses to salinity. In Trinidad, P. reticulata is confined to freshwater despite being tolerant of brackish water. Poecilia reticulata may fail to occupy brackish water because of reduced tolerance to salinity or because P. picta competitively excludes them, and developing in brackish water could alter the dynamics of either scenario. To test this, we compared the salinity tolerances of both species in the absence of competition, reared P. reticulata individuals in freshwater or brackish water, and tested the consequences of developmental plasticity in experiments in which P. reticulata competed against conspecifics or P. picta during acute exposure to freshwater or brackish water. We found that 1) P. reticulata has a weaker salinity tolerance than P. picta, 2) P. reticulata that developed in freshwater perform best when competing against P. picta in freshwater but perform poorly when competing against P. picta in brackish water, suggesting the species interaction is context dependent, and 3) developing in brackish water did not benefit P. reticulata in brackish water. Our results suggest that P. reticulata’s freshwater range limit is in part a product of a lower salinity tolerance leading to a decrease in competitive performance in brackish water. Adaptive plasticity has been suggested to be a crucial part of the colonization process, yet non-adaptive plastic responses as found here can limit range expansion and reinforce range limits.
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.vmcvdnd23
This dataset contains the input data for analyses examining specific growth rate in juvenile Poecilia reticulata and Poecilia picta (sheet entitled “TablesS1-3”), change in body condition in P. reticulata during competition experiments (sheets entitled “TablesS4-6” and “TableS7”), difference in aggressive behaviors between P. reticulata and P. picta competitors (sheets entitled “TablesS8-10” and “TableS11”), and total aggressive behavior counts in P. reticulata (sheet entitled “TableS12”) and in P. picta (sheet entitled “TableS13”).
Description of the data and file structure
The first sheet of the excel file is a key explaining any non-obvious terms that relate to the various factors used in our analyses. The other sheets include the data and are organized by their corresponding table(s) in Appendix S1 of the manuscript.
Code/Software
All analyses were conducted in R version 4.2.2. In addition to base R, the lsmeans package and the lme4 package are needed to conduct the analyses in the manuscript.
This dataset includes an excel file containing all the data needed to carry out the analyses detailed in the manuscript and shown in full in Appendix S1 of the manuscript. The data is the raw input into the analyses conducted in the analysis. The first sheet in the excel file is a key and the other sheets contain data and are labeled according to the tables they relate to in Appendix S1 of the manuscript.