Data from: The emergence of novel versus known three-dimensional structures from random sequences
Data files
Jun 16, 2026 version files 54.30 GB
-
README.md
3.15 KB
-
selected_plddt_10mer.zip
11.50 GB
-
selected_plddt_11mer.zip
7.01 GB
-
selected_plddt_120mer.zip
1.24 MB
-
selected_plddt_12mer.zip
7.06 GB
-
selected_plddt_13mer.zip
2.73 GB
-
selected_plddt_15mer.zip
1.94 GB
-
selected_plddt_17mer.zip
4.21 GB
-
selected_plddt_20mer.zip
2.14 GB
-
selected_plddt_24mers.zip
1.65 GB
-
selected_plddt_30mer.zip
155.12 MB
-
selected_plddt_40mer.zip
35.24 MB
-
selected_plddt_5mer.zip
1.86 GB
-
selected_plddt_60mer.zip
7.26 MB
-
selected_plddt_6mer.zip
3.90 GB
-
selected_plddt_7mer.zip
2.71 GB
-
selected_plddt_8mer.zip
7.37 GB
-
selected_plddt_9mer.zip
21.88 MB
Abstract
It has been hypothesized that random sequences are unlikely to fold into proteins of the length of globular proteins, but that shorter repeated random sequences are more likely to adopt folded conformations, which were predecessors to modern proteins. To test this idea, we used structure prediction methods to determine the foldability of approximately 120-residue sequences composed of 5- to 60-residue random repeats. With repeats of less than 30-residues, sequences were discovered that fold with high confidence (1 - 12%). The most frequent structures were β-solenoids and repeating β-hairpins, although helical bundles were observed when insertions or deletions were included between blocks of repeating sequences. We also observed a new super-secondary structure consisting of a tightly wound α-helical screw, and experimentally confirmed its stability and structure by CD spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography. Thus, folding programs are able to predict repeating structures that are well out of the distribution of structures upon which they were trained. However, very few random sequences with 60-residue repeats or lacking repeats altogether were predicted to fold, and the small number of structures we observed were representative of the already established major classes of tertiary structures; greater sampling would be needed to discover novel structures from a random distribution. These studies validate previous predictions that proteins evolved through the repetition and assortment of short peptide sequences.
Dataset DOI: 10.5061/dryad.vmcvdnd4m
This dataset contains all structural prediction files used in the manuscript “The emergence of novel versus known three-dimensional structures from random sequences.” The study examines how repeat length influences the foldability, structural diversity, and designability of 120-residue proteins constructed from short tandem repeats. For each repeat length, ~1,000,000 random sequences were predicted using RaptorX.
The dataset consists of ZIP archives containing the high-confidence predicted structures (mean pLDDT ≥ 90). These data were used to compute foldability fractions, cluster distributions, and structural characterization across repeat lengths.
Description of files
selected_plddt_5mer.zip
Models derived from 5-residue repeats. Files are named according to the following convention:
RS6X20_rand_XXXXX.pdb, where XXXXX is the number of the random sequence that was selected with a passing pLDDT score. RS is an abbreviation for Random Sequence, and rand is an abbreviation for random. The files can be viewed in the softwares Pymol, ChimeraX, or alternative protein structure viewing tools.
selected_plddt_6mer.zip
Predictions from 6-residue repeats. Naming convention same as for 5mer.
selected_plddt_7mer.zip
Predictions from 7-residue repeats. Naming convention same as for 5mer.
selected_plddt_8mer.zip
Predictions from 8-residue repeats. Naming convention same as for 5mer.
selected_plddt_9mer.zip
Predictions from 9-residue repeats. Naming convention same as for 5mer.
selected_plddt_10mer.zip
Predictions from 10-residue repeats. Naming convention same as for 5mer.
selected_plddt_11mer.zip
Predictions from 11-residue repeats. Naming convention same as for 5mer.
selected_plddt_12mer.zip
Predictions from 12-residue repeats. Naming convention same as for 5mer.
selected_plddt_13mer.zip
Predictions from 13-residue repeats. Naming convention same as for 5mer.
selected_plddt_15mer.zip
Predictions from 15-residue repeats. Naming convention same as for 5mer.
selected_plddt_17mer.zip
Predictions from 17-residue repeats. Naming convention same as for 5mer.
selected_plddt_20mer.zip
Predictions from 20-residue repeats. Naming convention same as for 5mer.
selected_plddt_24mers.zip
Predictions from 24-residue repeats. Naming convention same as for 5mer.
selected_plddt_30mer.zip
Predictions from 30-residue repeats. Naming convention same as for 5mer.
selected_plddt_40mer.zip
Predictions from 40-residue repeats. Naming convention same as for 5mer.
selected_plddt_60mer.zip
Predictions from 60-residue repeats. Naming convention same as for 5mer.
selected_plddt_120mer.zip
Predictions from 120-residue repeats. Naming convention same as for 5mer.
Contact
For questions or additional information, please contact the corresponding authors listed in the manuscript.
