Skip to main content
Dryad

Data from: Bumblebee queens are better at olfactory learning and more sensitive to scents than workers

Kimball, Melanie1; Muth, Felicity1

Published Mar 23, 2026 on Dryad. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.wdbrv1649

Data files

Mar 23, 2026 version files 360.31 KB

Click names to download individual files

Abstract

Intra-specific variation in cognition can reflect ecological demands, yet cognitive performance can be driven by non-cognitive processes. Bumblebees have been a long-standing model in the study of cognition for their aptitude at learning associations, but nearly all research has been limited to one life stage: foraging workers. Queen bumblebees also forage, and previous work shows that they learn visual associations with fewer errors than workers, offering a useful comparison of the drivers of variation in cognition. Here we tested whether queens’ better learning performance holds across another modality: olfaction, and whether performance could be driven by non-cognitive variables related to their larger size, including peripheral sensitivity. We first assessed olfactory learning in wild Bombus vosnesenskii and found that queens learned with fewer errors than workers. Following additional training and sensitivity tests, queens and workers did not differ, ruling out non-cognitive variables as drivers of learning differences. In a second experiment, we tested scent sensitivity under more controlled conditions in B. impatiens and found that queens were more sensitive. Our findings confirm learning differences between bumblebee castes and show that queens also have greater peripheral sensitivity, hinting at adaptive drivers of these intra-specific differences.