Data from: Microstructural and geochemical evidence offers a solution to the cephalopod cameral deposits riddle
Data files
Oct 28, 2025 version files 38.06 MB
-
EBSD_PZO_16535-01.cpr
2 KB
-
EBSD_PZO_16535-01.crc
2.48 MB
-
EBSD_PZO_16535-01.ctf
6.35 MB
-
EBSD_PZO_16535-01.txt
779 B
-
EBSD_PZO_16538-02.cpr
2.30 KB
-
EBSD_PZO_16538-02.crc
8.36 MB
-
EBSD_PZO_16538-02.ctf
20.86 MB
-
EBSD_PZO_16538-02.txt
802 B
-
README.md
1.83 KB
Abstract
Orthoceratoid cephalopods are common in the Palaeozoic rock record but became extinct in the Late Triassic. Many orthoceratoids contain cameral deposits, which are enigmatic calcareous structures within their chambered shell that presumably balanced their straight conchs in a horizontal position. Since the mid-19th century, palaeontologists have attempted to understand the cameral deposit formation process. The various hypotheses include growth from cameral fluids, precipitation by a cameral mantle or even their dismissal as post-mortem structures. All of these previous interpretations have in common that they are complicated by contradictory evidence. Here, we present evidence from well-preserved Trematoceras elegans specimens from the Late Triassic St. Cassian Formation (Dolomites, northern Italy). We studied the specimens by using optical and electron beam microanalysis techniques and argue that the cameral deposits consist of primary aragonite and calcite fabrics. A fibrous microstructure, which is bilaterally symmetrically arranged with irregularities, is documented. Thin organic sheets originally delimited radial growth sectors. Based on these observations, we propose a new growth model that explicitly involves the cameral sheets. These sheets acted as an extension of the pellicle and held a thin film of supersaturated liquid in the otherwise emptied chambers by the cameral sheets via the capillary effect. Ions were supplied through the siphuncle, such as in living Nautilus, and enabled the precipitation of aragonite and calcite fabrics. This model goes beyond previous interpretations, resolves contradictory observations and has functional implications, suggesting that cameral sheets and deposits were an adaptation to increased growth rates.
Contact: Alexander Pohle, Ruhr University Bochum, Germany, alexander.pohle@rub.de
This dataset contains Electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) data gathered from thin sections of two specimens of Trematoceras elegans from the lower Carnian (Late Triassic) St. Cassian Formation of northern Italy. The thin sections are housed in the Naturmuseum Bozen, South Tyrol, Italy, under the repository numbers PZO 16535-01 (cross section) and PZO 16538-02 (longitudinal section).
Description of the data and file structure
Each file contains the prefixes EBSD and the corresponding repository number of the specimen. Additionally, the suffix CS indicates a cross section, while the suffix LS indicates a longitudinal section. For each specimen, four files are included:
- A Crystal Project Report (.cpr) file for reloading the analysis session in AZtec Crystal.
- A Crystal Report Configuration (.crc) file storing metadata such as phase information, indexing settings and display configurations. AZtec Crystal needed to load the file.
- A Channel Text File (.ctf) containing raw orientation data, including Euler angles, phase IDs, and spatial coordinates. This file contains the main results of the analysis. Open format, can be used without AZtec Crystal, e.g., using MTEX, an open source Matlab toolbox.
- A Text (.txt) file containing metadata stored in cpr and crc files for users without access to AZtec Crystal.
Thus, the following files are contained in the dataset:
- EBSD_PZO_16535-01.cpr
- EBSD_PZO_16535-01.crc
- EBSD_PZO_16535-01.ctf
- EBSD_PZO_16535-01.txt
- EBSD_PZO_16538-02.cpr
- EBSD_PZO_16538-02.crc
- EBSD_PZO_16538-02.ctf
- EBSD_PZO_16538-02.txt
