Data from: Environmental modifications of dung beetle larvae shape their growth and life history
Data files
Aug 12, 2025 version files 18.14 KB
-
ExRuDB1.csv
5.48 KB
-
ExRuDB2.csv
6.96 KB
-
ExRuDB3.csv
3.96 KB
-
README.md
1.73 KB
May 20, 2026 version files 18.14 KB
-
ExRuDB1.csv
5.48 KB
-
ExRuDB2.csv
6.96 KB
-
ExRuDB3.csv
3.96 KB
-
README.md
1.73 KB
Abstract
Organisms are not just passive recipients of environmental pressures but can shape the environment they experience. Yet, the mechanisms and evolutionary implications of such niche construction remain poorly understood. Here, we studied these effects in the gazelle dung beetle (Digitonthophagus gazella). Larvae of this species develop in an underground brood chamber (a 'brood ball') composed of dung, which serves as the sole source of food for a single larva. Throughout its development, the larva extensively modifies its environment by constantly eating, regurgitating, and shaping particle sizes within the brood ball. Previous research suggests that these larval manipulations increase environmental quality and nutrient availability. However, how larval modifications affect larval growth and how these modifications differ between species remain poorly understood. We studied the impact of larval environmental modifications by transplanting eggs into previously modified or unmodified environments, whilst controlling for the confounding effect of maternally derived microbes. Additionally, we also studied how D. gazella larvae grow in an environment that was modified by a different species (Onthophagus binodis) to investigate species-specific differences in niche construction. Counter to expectations, we found that larval modifications by conspecifics did not confer a fitness benefit to D. gazella. However, surprisingly, individuals developing in a brood ball modified by a heterospecific individual emerged significantly quicker. These findings provide mixed support that environmental modifications by a larva enhance its growth. Our research adds to the growing literature on the complex interactions between organisms and their environment and how those interactions feed back on organismal development and performance.
Dataset DOI: 10.5061/dryad.z8w9ghxqv
Description of the data and file structure
ExRuDB1.csv
Development data for individuals who made it past 7 days. Empty cells represent that the data was not determined.
- Block:
- Block 1 = 8/29/2024 - 10/19/2024
- Block 2 = 9/13/2024 - 10/31/2024
- Block 3 = 09/22/2024 - 11/16/2024
- Dates include breeding container and brood ball collection
- Treatment:
- 8-UB = Unmodified Control incubated for 8 days
- 1-UB = Fresh unmodified control
- HET = O. binodis modified brood ball
- CON = D. gazella modified brood ball
- plate = treatment + number: 8-UB1 = Unmodified Control incubated for 8 days
- position: Position in the 12-well plate A-C, 1-4
- ID: Individual identifier
- Date hatched: Date the focal egg hatched
- Day5LW: Focal larval weight (in grams) 5 days after hatching
- Day7LW: Focal larval weight (in grams) 7 days after hatching
- AbsoluteGrowth: Difference in weight (g) between days 5 and 7
- GrowthPercent: Absolute growth as a percentage
- Pupation: Date focal larvae identified as a Pupa. Empty cells represent data available.
- Adult Emergencee: Emergence the of focal adult from the pupal stage
- Devtime_Days: Time in days from date hatched to adult emergence
- ProWid: Pronotum width (mm)
- Sex: M = Male, F = Female
- datedied: Date of focal death
ExRuDB2.csv
Survival data for hatched individuals
- Event: 0 = Died, 1 = Alive
ExRuDB3.csv
Event data for all eggs used in the experiment
- unhatched: 0 = unhatched, 1 = hatched
