Skip to main content
Dryad

Data and code from: Chronic wasting disease exposure risk to male cervids during the mating season in a multi-host community

Data files

Sep 29, 2026 version files 1.13 MB

Click names to download individual files

Abstract

Background: Multi-host infectious diseases are challenging to manage due to variation in: 1) spatial overlap amongst species; 2) contact rates; and 3) host competence. Chronic wasting disease, a lethal disease affecting cervids, exemplifies these challenges. The study focuses on three male cervid species (mule deer, white-tailed deer, and elk) during the mating season in an area where CWD is enzootic.

Methods: This study was conducted near Scottsbluff, NE, USA, in the Wildcat Hills. Wildlife camera traps were deployed across three site types, including two potential hotspots for disease transmission - water tanks and white-tailed deer scrape sites - and reference sites that captured background levels of deer activity. Camera traps measured both spatial overlap of male cervid species, along with species-specific contact rates with the environment and conspecifics. Contact rates were used to calculate intra- and interspecific environmental and direct exposure risk under assumptions of both equal and variable competence between species. Variable host competence was evaluated using a systematic review of the scientific literature.

Results and conclusions: Interspecific environmental exposure risk was 100 and 6 times higher at water tank and scrape sites than reference sites for mule deer and white-tailed deer. Risk to elk occurred exclusively at water tanks. All interspecific environmental exposure risk occurred a water tank and scrape sites. Under an assumption of variable competence, the proportion of total risk attributed to intraspecific vs interspecific sources were vastly different when compared to an assumption of equal competence for species with the greatest potential differences in host competence (elk and mule deer). We found no significant differences in direct exposure for mule deer, the only species for which we were able to compare risk across site types.