Engineered virus-like particles for transient delivery of prime editor ribonucleoprotein complexes in vivo
Data files
Sep 24, 2025 version files 55.76 KB
-
PEeVLP_Fig5_numeric_data.xlsx
53.91 KB
-
README.md
1.86 KB
Abstract
Prime editing enables precise installation of genomic substitutions, insertions, and deletions in living systems. Efficient in vitro and in vivo delivery of prime editing components, however, remains a challenge. Here, we report prime editor engineered virus-like particles (PE-eVLPs) that deliver prime editor proteins, prime editing guide RNAs, and nicking single guide RNAs as transient ribonucleoprotein complexes. We systematically engineered v3 and v3b PE-eVLPs with 65- to 170-fold higher editing efficiency in human cells compared to a PE-eVLP construct based on our previously reported base editor eVLP architecture. In two mouse models of genetic blindness, single injections of v3 PE-eVLPs resulted in therapeutically relevant levels of prime editing in the retina, protein expression restoration, and partial visual function rescue. Optimized PE-eVLPs support transient in vivo delivery of prime editor ribonucleoproteins, enhancing the potential safety of prime editing by reducing off-target editing and obviating the possibility of oncogenic transgene integration.
Dataset DOI: 10.5061/dryad.tht76hfc8
Description of the data and file structure
Numerical source data for retinal tissue prime editing showed in Figure 5 and Extended Data Figure 10. We show editing data, indel rates, and off-target editing for two mouse models.
Files and variables
File: PEeVLP_Fig5_numeric_data.xlsx
Description: Source data
Sheet Fig5c
Precise editing rates by NGS and insertion/deletion rates (indel) for treated rd6 mice vs non-treated rd6 mice
Sheet Fig5f
Total editing rates for on-target and off-target sites 1 through 10 (OT1-10) for treated rd6 mice vs non-treated rd6 mice
Sheet Fig 5g
Total indel rates for on-target and off-target sites 1 through 10 (OT1-10) for treated rd6 mice vs non-treated rd6 mice
Sheet Fig 5ijl
Precise editing rates by NGS and insertion/deletion rates (indel) for treated rd12 mice vs non-treated rd12 mice
Electroretinography (ERG) quantification (in microvolts, µV) of a- and b-waves for light-invoked stimuli for treated rd12 mice vs non-treated rd12 mice
Sheet Fig 5m
Electroretinography (ERG) traces (time versus amplitude, microseconds vs nanovolts) for light-invoked stimuli for treated rd12 mice vs non-treated rd12 mice vs WT mice
ED Fig 10
Total editing rates for on-target and off-target sites 1 through 10 (OT1-10) for treated rd12 mice vs non-treated rd12 mice
Total indel rates for on-target and off-target sites 1 through 10 (OT1-10) for treated rd12 mice vs non-treated rd12 mice
Access information
Other publicly accessible location of the data:
