Diets of the introduced domestic cat (Felis catus), red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and dingo (Canis familiaris) in Australia
Data files
Dec 18, 2025 version files 2.18 MB
-
Appendix_list_of_studies.docx
45.09 KB
-
Appendix_of_studies.csv
103.33 KB
-
Appendix_of_studies.pdf
1.86 MB
-
Appendix_of_studies.xlsx
156.40 KB
-
README.md
11.25 KB
Abstract
The introduction of the domestic cat and the red fox has devastated Australian native fauna. We synthesised Australian diet analyses to identify traits of prey species in cat, fox, and dingo diets, which prey was more frequent or distinctive to the diet of each predator, and quantified dietary overlap. Nearly half (45%) of all Australian terrestrial mammal, bird, and reptile species occurred in the diets of one or more predators. Cat and dingo diets overlapped the least (0.64±0.27, n=24 location/time points) and the cat diet changed little over 55 years of study. Cats were more likely to have eaten birds, reptiles, and small mammals than foxes or dingoes. The dingo's diet remained constant over 53 years and constituted the largest mammal, bird, and reptile prey, including more macropods/potoroids, wombats, monotremes, and bandicoots/bilbies than cats or foxes. Fox diet had greater overlap with both cats (0.79±0.20, n=37) and dingoes (0.73±0.21, n=42), fewer distinctive items (plant material, possums/gliders), and significant spatial heterogeneity over 69 years, suggesting prey switching (especially of mammal prey) to mitigate competition. Our study reinforced concerns about mesopredator impacts on scarce/threatened species and the need to control foxes and cats for fauna conservation. However, extensive dietary overlap and low incidence of mesopredators in dingo diets precluded the resolution of the debate about possible dingo suppression of foxes and cats.
Dataset DOI: 10.5061/dryad.612jm646j
Description of the data and file structure
Distinctive diets of eutherian predators in Australia
We synthesised Australian diet analyses to identify traits of prey species in cat, fox and dingo diets, which prey were more frequent or distinctive to the diet of each predator, and quantified dietary overlap.
Files and variables
File: Appendix_of_studies.xlsx, Appendix_of_studies.csv, Appendix_of_studies.pdf
Description: Main data file in three formats
| Variable | Description |
|---|---|
| Predator | species |
| Location | study site description |
| State | Australian state or territory |
| Source | Reference (see Appendix_list_of_studies.docx) |
| Latitude | Coordinates |
| Longitude | Coordinates |
| mainland | Mainland (1) or island (0) |
| modified | Modified landscapes (e.g. tips) |
| samples | samples (no data for Mahood 1980) |
| sample.type | Stomachs (1) or Scat (0) or proportion of each (no data for Mahood 1980) |
| num | Number of samples (no data for Mahood 1980) |
| FOO_Mammal | Frequency of Occurrence of all mammals |
| FOO_NativeMammal | Frequency of Occurrence of native mammals |
| FOO_IntroducedMammal | Frequency of Occurrence of introduced mammals |
| FOO_RabbitHare | Frequency of Occurrence of these species |
| FOO_Rodent | Frequency of Occurrence of these species |
| FOO_NativeRodent | Frequency of Occurrence of these species |
| FOO_IntroducedRodent | Frequency of Occurrence of these species |
| FOO_Livestock | Frequency of Occurrence of these species |
| FOO_MacropodPotoroo | Frequency of Occurrence of these species |
| FOO_PossumGlider | Frequency of Occurrence of these species |
| FOO_Bandicoot | Frequency of Occurrence of these species |
| FOO_Dasyurid | Frequency of Occurrence of these species |
| FOO_Numbat | Frequency of Occurrence of this species |
| FOO_Monotreme | Frequency of Occurrence of these species |
| FOO_Bat | Frequency of Occurrence of these species |
| FOO_Notoryctes | Frequency of Occurrence of these species |
| FOO_Koala | Frequency of Occurrence of this species |
| FOO_Wombat | Frequency of Occurrence of these species |
| FOO_DingoDog | Frequency of Occurrence of this species |
| FOO_Fox | Frequency of Occurrence of this species |
| FOO_Cat | Frequency of Occurrence of this species |
| FOO_Bird | Frequency of Occurrence of these species |
| FOO_Reptile | Frequency of Occurrence of these species |
| FOO_Frog | Frequency of Occurrence of these species |
| FOO_Fish | Frequency of Occurrence of these species |
| FOO_Invertebrate | Frequency of Occurrence of Invertebrates |
| FOO_Plant | Frequency of Occurrence of plant material |
| Collection_MIDPOINT | Mid point between sample collection start and end |
| Include_MAIN | Included in the analysis of main diet categories |
| Include_MAMMALS | Included in the analysis of mammal prey |
| IBRA_code | Biogeographic region |
| IBRA_name | Biogeographic region |
| MEAN_map | mean annual precipitation (mm) |
| MEAN_mat | mean annual temperature (C) |
| dist_to_coast_km | Distance to the nearest coastline |
| MEAN_cover | Average vegetation cover |
| hum_pop_den_5k | Human population density |
| rugged_5k | Terrain ruggedness |
| MAJORITY_vast | Dominant category for the Vegetation Assets, States and Transitions (VAST) classification of Australian vegetation |
File: Appendix_list_of_studies.docx
Description: Reference list of studies.
Code/software
No code is provided with this dataset.
Frequency of occurrence models were fitted using a Tweedie distribution, which applies a gamma distribution to the data that accounts for true zeros (absence of particular prey species), using the ‘tweedie’ package in R. Presence/absence models were fitted using a binomial generalised linear model (glm) in the ‘lme4’ package [108] in R. The effects of predictor variables on diet overlap for the best model were visualised using ggpredict from the ‘ggeffects’ package in R, when all other variables are held constant at their mean/median value.
(a) Pianka’s index of dietary overlap
For studies that presented simultaneously-collected diet data on more than one predator species, we calculated dietary overlap, Oij using the ‘spaa’ package in R. We analysed overlap data using a generalised linear model in ‘lme4’ (followed by Tukey’s post hoc analysis using the ‘emmeans’ package) for associations by predator species. We tested for collinearity between predictors using the vif function in the ‘car’ package in R. The effects of predictor variables on diet overlap for the best model were visualised using ggpredict, in which all other variables are held constant at their mean/median value.
(c) Diet composition and distinctiveness
To test for between-species differences in overall diet composition (including animals taken as either prey or carrion), we carried out non-parametric permutational ANOVA (PERMANOVA) using the adonis function in the ‘vegan’ package in R. To identify bias due to sample type, we carried out a Similarity Percentage (SIMPER) analysis on the differences between analyses of stomach contents and scats. We then used the multipatt function in the ‘indicspecies’ package in R to identify the diet categories most strongly associated with the diets of each predator or groups (pairs in this case) of predators.
(d) Mantel test to identify trends with spatial or temporal separation
A Mantel test was carried out to analyse spatial and temporal influences on diet composition for (i) the 7 main food categories and (ii) the 15 broad mammal taxa (as described above)..
(e) GLM to compare FOO lagomorphs with time and RHDV
We carried out Spearman’s rank order correlation analysis to identify which prey types changed in frequency of occurrence over time. This was followed by a generalised linear model (GLM) with Tukey’s post hoc analysis (using the ‘emmeans’ package) to compare lagomorph FOO before and after the vectored introduction of the lagovirus, Rabbit Haemorrhagic Disease Virus (RHDV) in 1995, and then after introduction of more lethal strains of the virus since 2015.
Access information
Other publicly accessible locations of the data:
- Appendix of studies Excel worksheet
Data was derived from the following sources:
- Appendix list of studies Word document
We systematically searched the literature for empirical data on the frequency of occurrence (FOO; the proportion of all samples that contain the diet item) of foods consumed by each of the three predator species and traced all citations for further potential sources, including journal articles, book chapters, theses, unpublished reports, and contacted authors directly where possible for clarification and additional data. For the 157 studies using classical morphological methods (macro and microhistology) to identify diet items, we calculated FOO data for 421 location–time point combinations for 264 sites across Australia for:
(i) 7 main food categories: all mammals (summed), birds, squamate reptiles (‘squamates’), amphibians (frogs), fish, invertebrates and plant material, and
(ii) 15 broad mammal taxonomic groups:
- Nine native mammal taxonomic groups – dasyurids (Family Dasyuridae); possums and gliders (Suborder Phalangerida); macropods and potoroids (Suborder Macropodiformes); bandicoots and bilbies (Order Peramelemorphia); koalas Phascolarctos cinereus (Goldfuss); wombats (Lasiorhinus spp., bare-nosed wombat Vombatus ursinus (Shaw)); bats (Order Chiroptera); monotremes (short-beaked echidna Tachyglossus aculeatus (Shaw) and platypus Ornithorhynchus anatinus (Shaw)); and marsupial moles (Notoryctes spp.). Data were insufficient for the numbat (Myrmecobius fasciatus Waterhouse), which has a limited geographical range.
- Two introduced mammal categories – lagomorphs (European rabbit and European brown hare, Lepus europaeus Pallas), and livestock. These included farmed (mostly sheep, cattle, and goat Capra hircus Linnaeus) and feral livestock, some likely to have been scavenged (from most to least commonly recorded: sheep, cattle, feral pig Sus scrofa Linnaeus, camel, goat, sambar deer Cervus unicolor Kerr, chital deer Axis axis (Erxleben), horse, water buffalo Bubalus bubalis Linnaeus, fallow deer Dama dama (Linnaeus), hog deer Axis porcinus (Zimmermann), red deer Cervus elaphus Linnaeus and donkey Equus asinus Linnaeus).
Rodents – FOOs were mostly calculated separately for introduced and native species but were analysed together because species were not always distinguished. Their separate FOO values contributed to the calculations of the FOO of native vs. introduced species.
The three predator species themselves.
- Fleming, Patricia A.; Stobo-Wilson, Alyson M.; Crawford, Heather M. et al. (2022). Distinctive diets of eutherian predators in Australia. Royal Society Open Science. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.220792
