Data from: Fuzzy boundaries: Color and gene flow patterns among parapatric lineages of the Western shovel-nosed snake and taxonomic implication
Data files
Feb 20, 2025 version files 313.27 KB
-
CHIONACTIS_mtDNA_ND1_Matrix.nex
250.31 KB
-
CHOC_Microsatellite_GENEPOP.txt
22.69 KB
-
README.md
3.63 KB
-
TableS1.csv
36.65 KB
Abstract
Accurate delineation of lineage diversity is increasingly important, as species distributions are becoming more reduced and threatened. During the last century, the subspecies category was often used to denote phenotypic variation within a species range and to provide a framework for understanding lineage differentiation, often considered incipient speciation. While this category has largely fallen into disuse, previously recognized subspecies often serve as important units for conservation policy and management when other information is lacking. In this study, we evaluated phenotypic subspecies hypotheses within shovel-nosed snakes on the basis of genetic data and considered how evolutionary processes such as gene flow influenced possible incongruence between phenotypic and genetic patterns. We used both traditional phylogenetic and Bayesian clustering analyses to infer range-wide genetic structure and spatially explicit analyses to detect possible boundary locations of lineage contact. Multilocus analyses supported three historically isolated groups with low to moderate levels of contemporary gene exchange. Genetic data did not support phenotypic subspecies as exclusive groups, and we detected patterns of discordance in areas where three subspecies are presumed to be in contact. Based on genetic and phenotypic evidence, we suggested that species-level diversity is underestimated in this group and we proposed that two species be recognized, Chionactis occipitalis and C. annulata. In addition, we recommend retention of two subspecific designations within C. annulata (C. a. annulata and C. a. klauberi) that reflect regional shifts in both genetic and phenotypic variation within the species. Our results highlight the difficultly in validating taxonomic boundaries within lineages that are evolving under a time-dependent, continuous process.
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.77rf2
Description of the data and file structure
We used both traditional phylogenetic (nexus file) and Bayesian clustering analyses (genepop file) to infer range-wide genetic structure and spatially explicit analyses to detect possible boundary locations of lineage contact.
Files and variables
File: CHOC_Microsatellite_GENEPOP.txt
Description: 11 loci (Chionactis 11 loci: PEN160, TRI176, TET1713, TRI1164, PEN5400, TRI222, TRI1925, TRI199, TET193, TRI2219, TET1847)
Variables
- 4 population grouped by subspecies
- pop1 = Chionactis occipitalis talpina
- pop2 = Chionactis occipitalis occipitalis
- pop3 = Chionactis occipitalis annulata
- pop4 = Chionactis occipitalis klauberi
File: CHIONACTIS_mtDNA_ND1_Matrix.nex
Description: Nexus file of mtDNA sequences
File: TableS1.csv
Description: Tissue samples used in this study along with mtDNA lineage/clade and microsatellite cluster assignments, morphology, and locality information. Abbreviations and field series abbreviations are as follows: ASU, Arizona State University; ATH, Andrew T. Holycross; BEZY, Robert L. Bezy;DAW, Dustin A. Wood; DGM, Daniel G. Mulcahy; JESMM, Jesse M. Meik; RDB, Randy Babb; RNF, Robert N. Fisher; ROM, Royal Ontario Museum; RWM, Robert W. Murphy; SDSNH (SD Field), San Diego Natural History Museum; TCB, Thomas C. Brennan; TRJ, Thomas R. Jones; UAZ, University of Arizona; UTA, University of Texas, Arlington; all other tissues were obtained from field surveys conducted by the San Diego Field Station, US Geological Survey. "n/a" = not applicable
Variables
- Tissue ID
- Voucher ID (museum or field ID)
- Species - following proposed taxonomy from the results of the study
- mtDNA lineage - details which mtDNA lineage or clade the sample is associated with
- Microsatellite Cluster - details which cluster the sample was assigned to and the posterior probability of that assignment
- Morphology scaled - whether color pattern and morpological data were taken for that specimen. A 'yes' means that a voucher sample was obtain and morphology was scored. A 'no' means no voucher specimen was available, only a tissue sample was taken.
- County, State, County (if available), and Locality where the tissue sample was collected
- Latitude/Longitude - gps coordinates where the sample was taken
File: FigS1_Mojave_clade.pdf
Description: Mojave lineage pruned from the full mtDNAphylogeny, shown in the upper left.Numbers at nodesrepresent posterior probability support values for individual clades.
File: FigS3_Colorado_clade.pdf
Description: Colorado lineage pruned from the fullmtDNA phylogeny, shown in the upper left.Numbers atnodes represent posterior probability support values for individualclades.
File: FigS2_Sonoran_clade.pdf
Description: Sonoran lineage pruned from the full mtDNAphylogeny, shown in the upper left.Numbers at nodesrepresent posterior probability support values for individual clades.
File: FigS5_Geneland.pdf
Description: Posterior density of the number of clusters(K) from the MCMC analysis of genetic structure acrossArizona usingGENELAND.
File: FigS4_K_approximation.pdf
Description: Results from the mean lnP(D|K) scoreagainst the KMAXand theDKcriterion of Evanno et al
Access information
Data was derived from the source: See publication
- Wood, Dustin A.; Fisher, Robert N.; Vandergast, Amy G. (2014). Fuzzy Boundaries: Color and Gene Flow Patterns among Parapatric Lineages of the Western Shovel-Nosed Snake and Taxonomic Implication. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097494
