Demographic information and phthalate metabolite concentrations (µg/L) detected in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) urine sampled from Barataria Bay, LA during 2011-2023 and Sarasota Bay, FL during 2010-2019, 2022-2024
Data files
May 30, 2025 version files 24.74 KB
-
Frontiers_Dolphin_Urine_Data_REPOSITORY.xlsx
22.75 KB
-
README.md
1.98 KB
Dec 22, 2025 version files 24.69 KB
-
Frontiers_Dolphin_Urine_Data_REPOSITORY.xlsx
22.71 KB
-
README.md
1.98 KB
Abstract
Exposure to phthalate esters has previously been documented in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) inhabiting an urban estuary (Sarasota Bay, FL, USA; 2010-2019). Phthalates are chemicals commonly added to plastic products and consumer goods to enhance qualities such as flexibility, fragrance, and stability. These chemicals are known to leach out of plastic products and into the marine environment, leaving wildlife vulnerable to reproductive, developmental, and metabolic health effects. Environmental phthalate exposure has been shown to vary relative to human activity and urbanization. To evaluate potential differences in dolphin exposure risk, urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations were compared between free-ranging bottlenose dolphins from an urban (Sarasota Bay, FL, USA; 2010-2023; n= 71 ) and rural estuary (Barataria Bay, LA, USA; 2011-2023; n = 45). The magnitude of MEHP detection did not differ significantly between sampling sites (p = 0.97); however, MEHP was detected more frequently in Sarasota Bay dolphins (73.24%; n=52; 95% CI: 61.20-82.73) than Barataria Bay dolphins (33.33%; n = 15; 95% CI: 20.00 - 48.95%). Further, dolphins from Sarasota Bay may be exposed to a greater diversity of phthalates compared to Barataria Bay dolphins as indicated by differences in the detected phthalate metabolite profile. Notably, Barataria dolphins were also affected by the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, warranting additional studies of potential phthalate sources and health implications among these dolphins.
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.pc866t20f
Description of the data and file structure
Bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus)* *sampled for this study were from the Barataria Bay Estuarine System Stock occupying Barataria Basin in Louisiana, and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) stock that includes dolphins using Sarasota Bay, and Little Sarasota Bay (Tyson and Wells, 2016) in Florida. Catch-and-release health assessments of the dolphins in Barataria Bay, LA were conducted in 2011, 2013-2014, 2017-2019, and 2023, and in Sarasota Bay, FL during 2010-2019, 2022-2024 in which dolphins of interest were encircled by a net and lifted onto a veterinary examination boat where urine and other biological sampling was conducted. Urine was collected from each dolphin via catheterization by a trained veterinarian and stored at -80℃ until sample analysis. Urine samples and blanks were frozen in liquid nitrogen for storage and transport prior to analysis. Samples were stored at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Biorepository (Hollings Marine Laboratory, Charleston, SC, USA).
Files and variables
File: Frontiers_Dolphin_Urine_Data_REPOSITORY.xlsx
Description:
Variables
- Tab "PHTHALATE METABOLITE RAW DATA" - provides concentrations of each phthalate metabolite quantified from individual dolphin urine samples; no missing values
- Tab "LOD VALUES" - provides values for the limit of detection for each phthalate metabolite; no missing values
- Tab "DATA GUIDE" - provides information on the variables provided in Tabs 1, 2; no missing values
- Tab "ABBREVIATIONS GUIDE" - provides the full term for each abbreviation used in Tabs 1, 2; no missing values
Each urine sample was screened for seven phthalate metabolites (MEP, MEHP, MEHHP, MEOHP, MBzP, MiBP, and MBP). Urine samples (1 mL) were spiked with isotopically labeled internal standards for each metabolite before proceeding to a glucuronidation step to release monoesters from their conjugated forms (Blount et al., 2000). Following glucuronidation, samples were extracted via SPE (Agilent Bond Elute Nexus) then separated and quantified using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC; Agilent 1100; WatersXBridge BEH C18, 2.5 μm, 2.1 x 50 mm analytical column) coupled to a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (MS; Applied Biosystems Sciex API 4000) with electrospray ionization (ESI negative) interface. Sample integrations were performed using Analyst software (Sciex ver 1.5). Prior to the acquisition of sample data, the instrument was calibrated (standard reference material (SRM) 3060: monoester phthalates in acetonitrile); coefficients of determination (r2) for all metabolites were ≥ 0.995.
Quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) samples (reagent blanks, reagent spikes, matrix spikes, SRM 3672 Organic Contaminants in Smokers’ Urine, and field blanks) were processed alongside the urine samples. Reagent and field blank values were subtracted from the determined concentration value to account for any metabolite contamination resulting from laboratory processes. Acceptable QA/QC criteria for spike (reagent and matrix) and SRM recoveries were 70%-130%. The limit of detection (LOD) was determined for each metabolite and is based on the lowest point on the calibration curve that could be detected on the instrument divided by the volume of the sample extracted.
Changes after May 30, 2025: A value for F155 MEOHP concentration was retained in error. The concentration (when blank corrected), was below the detectable limit, and the file has been updated to reflect the change.
