Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Viana, José Marcelo Soriano
dc.contributor.author Pereira, Helcio Duarte
dc.contributor.author Piepho, Hans-Peter
dc.contributor.author e Silva, Fabyano Fonseca
dc.date.accessioned 2019-08-13T16:02:34Z
dc.date.available 2019-08-13T16:02:34Z
dc.date.issued 2019-06-27
dc.identifier doi:10.5061/dryad.mb7664h
dc.identifier.citation Viana JMS, Pereira HD, Piepho H, e Silva FF (2019) Efficiency of genomic prediction of nonassessed testcrosses. Crop Science.
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.215471
dc.description In plant breeding, genomic selection has been mainly used to predict untested single crosses and testcrosses. The objectives of this study were to assess the efficiency of prediction of untested testcrosses and the significance of the factors affecting the prediction. We simulated 20,000 testcrosses from two groups of 5000 related doubled haploid lines (DHs) and two unrelated elite inbred lines. The DHs were genotyped for 20,000 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and the testcrosses were phenotyped for grain yield. The average SNP density was 0.1 cM. We assumed genetic control by 400 quantitative trait loci (QTLs) and heritability of 25, 50, and 75% for the assessed testcrosses. The training set sizes were 10 and 30% of the available DHs. The process of random sampling of the field assessed and predicted testcrosses were replicated 50 times. We computed the prediction accuracy and the coincidence index, a measure of the selection efficacy of the nonassessed testcrosses. The results evidenced that genomic selection is an efficient process for selecting superior nonassessed testcrosses, if there is sufficient relatedness between the available DHs, linkage disequilibrium in the DHs and genotypic variance between testcrosses, a training set size of at least 10% of the available DHs, and a SNP density of at least 1 cM. The efficacy of selecting the superior nonassessed testcrosses ranged between 0.1 and 0.9, proportional to the heritability of the assessed testcrosses (0.25–1.00). It is important to highlight that the parametric coincidence ranged from 0.1 to 0.8. Furthermore, genomic prediction is much more efficient than pedigree-based best linear unbiased prediction.
dc.relation.haspart doi:10.5061/dryad.mb7664h/1
dc.relation.isreferencedby doi:10.2135/cropsci2019.02.0118
dc.subject prediction accuracy
dc.subject general combining ability
dc.subject doubled haploids
dc.subject biparental population
dc.title Data from: Efficiency of genomic prediction of nonassessed testcrosses
dc.type Article
prism.publicationName Crop Science

Files in this package

Content in the Dryad Digital Repository is offered "as is." By downloading files, you agree to the Dryad Terms of Service. To the extent possible under law, the authors have waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this data. CC0 (opens a new window) Open Data (opens a new window)

Title DHs and testcrosses
Downloaded 2 times
Description Genotypic and phenotypic data for DHs and testcrosses.
Download DHs and testcrosses.rar (26.76 Mb)
Details View File Details

Search for data

Be part of Dryad

We encourage organizations to: