Data from: Response to food restriction, but not social information use, varies seasonally in captive cardueline finches
Data files
Apr 25, 2024 version files 20.69 KB
-
2024_Seasonal_Food_Restriction_Database.xlsx
-
README.md
Abstract
Temperate winters can impose severe conditions on songbirds that threaten survival, including shorter days and often lower temperature and food availability. One well-studied mechanism by which songbirds cope with such conditions is seasonal acclimatization of thermal metabolic traits, with strong evidence for both preparative and responsive changes in thermogenic capacity (i.e., the ability to generate heat) to low winter temperature. However, a bird's ability to cope with seasonal extremes or unpredictable events is likely dependent on a combination of behavioral and physiological traits that function to maintain allostatic balance. The ability to cope with reduced food availability may be an important component of organismal response to temperate winters in songbirds. Here we compare responses to experimentally reduced food availability at different times of year in captive red crossbills (Loxia curvirostra) and pine siskins (Spinus pinus) – two species that cope with variable food resources and live in cold places – to investigate seasonal changes in the organismal response to food availability. Further, red crossbills are known to use social information to improve response to reduced food availability, so we also examine whether use of social information in this context varies seasonally in this species. We find that pine siskins and red crossbills lose less body mass during time-restricted feedings in late winter compared to summer, and that red crossbills further benefit from social information gathered from observing other food-restricted red crossbills in both seasons. Observed changes in body mass were only partially explained by seasonal differences in food intake. Our results demonstrate seasonal acclimation to food stress and social information use across seasons in a controlled captive environment and highlight the importance of considering diverse physiological systems (e.g., thermogenic, metabolic, digestive, etc) to understand organismal responses to environmental challenges.
README: Data from: Response to food restriction, but not social information use, varies seasonally in captive cardueline finches
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.37pvmcvt6
Raw data are provided for food intake and body mass during food restriction of red crossbills and pine siskins.
Description of the data and file structure
Bird ID: three digit identifier |
---|
Species: species of focal bird |
Housed in Pair? Birds were either housed alone (No) or with another bird. Pairs are identified by a similar pair number. |
Study Year: year in which data were collected |
Season: season in which data were collected |
Sex: M = male, F = female |
Social Information: birds were either food restricted without prior social warning from neighbors (None) or received three days of warning from food-restricted neighbors (Predictive) |
Food Intake 0: difference in mass of the food cup measured by electronic balance to nearest 0.01 grams on the day prior to food restriction. Food intake for birds housed in pairs is shown as an average for the cage. |
Food Intake 1: difference in mass of the food cup measured by electronic balance to nearest 0.01 grams on the first day of food restriction. Food intake for birds housed in pairs is shown as an average for the cage. |
Food Intake 3: difference in mass of the food cup measured by electronic balance to nearest 0.01 grams on the third day of food restriction. Food intake for birds housed in pairs is shown as an average for the cage. |
Mass 0: body mass measured by electronic balance to nearest 0.01 grams on the day prior to food restriction |
Mass 1: body mass measured by electronic balance to nearest 0.01 grams after the first day of food restriction |
Mass 3: body mass measured by electronic balance to nearest 0.01 grams on the third day of food restriction |
NA: Note that data may be missing if food was spilled or birds were removed early from the food restriction due to body mass concerns. |
Sharing/Access information
N/A
Code/Software
N/A
Methods
These data were collected in an experimental, repeated measures design across multiple different experiments. Experiments were identical in their food restriction methodology but were performed with different individuals and in different years. We use this database to compare seasonal differences in food intake and change in body mass during food restriction in captive finches - the red crossbill and pine siskin. Food was restricted by limiting the access to food cups to two 45-minute feeding sessions per day. We also compare seasonal differences in food intake and change in body mass during food restriction between red crossbills with and without predictive social information from food-restricted neighbors. The data deposited here are raw scores of food intake and body mass for each individual in the experiment across three days of food restriction. Some birds were housed as dyads and some individually. For dyads we calcualted food intake as the change in the mass of the food cup divided by two. Only one food intake score per pair was included in analysis of food intake, although the a food intake value is provided in this database for every individual.