Assessing the potential of camera traps for estimating activity pattern compared to collar-mounted activity sensors: A case study on Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) in South-Eastern Norway
Data files
Jun 03, 2024 version files 13.61 MB
-
AccelerometerData.Rdata
13.59 MB
-
CameraTrapsData.Rdata
14.49 KB
-
README.md
2.71 KB
Abstract
The diel activity patterns of animals convey information about physiology, ecological niches and animal behaviour relevant for both applied conservation and more theoretical research. However, these patterns are challenging to study in the field. The current gold-standard approach to quantify the movements and activity patterns of medium to large wildlife species is to use Global Positioning Systems (GPS) collars equipped with activity sensors (e.g., accelerometers). A more recent approach consists of inferring activity patterns from the time-stamped pictures of wildlife obtained from the camera traps now routinely used in wildlife monitoring projects. However, few studies have attempted to validate estimates of activity patterns obtained from camera traps against those obtained from activity sensors. In this study, we compared the diel activity pattern of the Eurasian lynx Lynx lynx inferred from detections by a network of over 300 camera traps active between 2010 and 2020, to activity patterns obtained from 18 GPS-collared lynx (8 females, 10 males) equipped with 2-axis accelerometer sensors, in the same area of southern Norway. Our results suggest that camera traps can be used to estimate diel activity curves that are comparable to those obtained from accelerometers. In our study 75 detections were sufficient to approximate the diel activity pattern obtained from accelerometer. Subsampling indicated that a low number of detections results in a coarser approximation of the diel activity pattern.
We have submitted our camera traps dataset (CameraTrapsData.Rdata) and accelerometer dataset (AccelerometerData.Rdata). Camera trap detections of lynx were obtained from 327 camera traps (Reconyx HC500 HC600, PC850, PC900 & HP2X, Holmen, Wisconsin, USA) distributed in the study area as part of the SCANDCAM project (https://viltkamera.nina.no/). Data used in this study resulted from 11 years of monitoring, from November 2010 to December 2020, and a total of 2292 independent detections of lynx. Accelerometer data were obtained from 18 lynx (8 females and 10 males) equipped with GPS collars that also contained 2-axis accelerometers (GPS plus mini, Vectronic Aerospace GmbH, Berlin, Germany) between 2008 and 2015 as part of the SCANDLYNX project (http://scandlynx.nina.no). Overall, data from the accelerometers covered a total of 5496 lynx days across an 8-year period, from 2008 to 2015, resulting in ~ 1.5 million 5-minutes recordings of activity.
Description of the datasets
Camera Traps Dataset
- STUDYAREA: county and/or regional name where the camera trap was set
- X: first two digits of the geographical x-coordinates (precise location data have been omitted as it is considered sensitive data)
- Y: first two digits of the geographical y-coordinates (precise location data have been omitted as it is considered sensitive data)
- DateTime: date and time of each detection of lynx
- HoursofLight: number of hours of light (daylight) calculated for each detection, based on the date of the detection and the geographical coordinates of the location of the camera trap
Accelerometer Dataset
- No: number of observation
- CollarID: identification number of the GPS collar
- ActivityX: recorded values of activity for the X axis
- ActivityY: recorded values of activity for the Y axis
- AnimalID: identification code for each individual
- datetime: date and time of each activity value recorded
- HoursofLight: number of hours of light (daylight) calculated for each activity value recorded, based on the date of the observation and the geographical coordinates of the location of the initial lynx capture
Information sources
Camera Traps Dataset was derived from the following source:
- SCANDCAM project (https://viltkamera.nina.no/)
Accelerometer Dataset was derived from the following source:
- SCANDLYNX project (http://scandlynx.nina.no)
- Iannino, Elena; Linnell, John D. C.; Devineau, Olivier et al. (2024). Assessing the potential of camera traps for estimating activity pattern compared to collar‐mounted activity sensors: a case study on Eurasian lynx Lynx lynx in south‐eastern Norway. Wildlife Biology. https://doi.org/10.1002/wlb3.01263
