Data from: Multilocus phylogeny and Bayesian estimates of species boundaries reveal hidden evolutionary relationships and cryptic diversity in Southeast Asian monitor lizards
Data files
Mar 22, 2013 version files 4.86 MB
-
glor44.fasta
-
glor52.fasta
-
glor74.fasta
-
INFILE
-
mainparams.txt
-
mt.fasta
-
prlr.fasta
-
varanus_1.bpp.ctl
-
Varanus_all_concatenated.phy
-
Varanus_partitions
-
varanus_sptree_1q_2rr_1strictclock.xml
-
varanus_sptree_1q_2rr_1ucldclock0.05.xml
-
varanus_sptree_2q_0rr_2strictclock.xml
-
varanus_sptree_2q_0rr_2ucldclock0.05.xml
-
varanus_sptree_2q_2rr_1strictclock.xml
-
varanus_sptree_2q_2rr_1ucldclock0.05.xml
-
varanus1_V1.txt
-
varanus1.Imap.txt
Abstract
Recent conceptual, technological, and methodological advances in phylogenetics have enabled increasingly robust statistical species delimitation in studies of biodiversity. As the variety of evidence purporting species diversity has increased, so too have the kinds of tools and inferential power of methods for delimiting species. Here we showcase an organismal system for a data-rich, comparative molecular approach to evaluating strategies of species delimitation among monitor lizards of the genus Varanus. The water monitors (Varanus salvator Complex), a widespread group distributed throughout Southeast Asia and southern India, have been the subject of numerous taxonomic treatments, which have drawn recent attention due to the possibility of undocumented species diversity. To date, studies of this group have relied on purportedly diagnostic morphological characters, with no attention given to the genetic underpinnings of species diversity. Using a 5-gene dataset, we estimated phylogeny and used multilocus genetic networks, analysis of population structure, and a Bayesian coalescent approach to infer species boundaries. Our results contradict previous systematic hypotheses, reveal surprising relationships between island and mainland lineages, and uncover novel, cryptic evolutionary lineages (i.e. new putative species). Our study contributes to a growing body of literature suggesting that, used in concert with other sources of data (e.g., morphology, ecology, biogeography), multilocus genetic data can be highly informative to systematists and biodiversity specialists when attempting to estimate species diversity and identify conservation priorities. We recommend holding in abeyance taxonomic decisions until multiple, converging lines of evidence are available to best inform taxonomists, evolutionary biologists, and conservationists.