Proteomic traits vary across taxa in a coastal Antarctic phytoplankton bloom
Cite this dataset
McCain, J. Scott P.; Allen, Andrew E.; Bertrand, Erin M. (2021). Proteomic traits vary across taxa in a coastal Antarctic phytoplankton bloom [Dataset]. Dryad. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.vt4b8gtrz
Abstract
Production and use of proteins is under strong selection in microbes, but it is unclear how proteome-level traits relate to ecological strategies. We identified and quantified proteomic traits of eukaryotic microbes and bacteria through an Antarctic phytoplankton bloom using in situ metaproteomics. Different taxa, rather than different environmental conditions, formed distinct clusters based on their ribosomal and photosynthetic proteomic proportions, and we propose that these characteristics relate to ecological differences. We defined and used a proteomic proxy for regulatory cost, which showed that SAR11 had the lowest regulatory cost of any taxa we observed at our summertime Southern Ocean study site. Haptophytes had lower regulatory cost than diatoms, which may underpin haptophyte-to-diatom bloom progression in the Ross Sea. We were able to make these proteomic trait inferences by assessing various sources of bias in metaproteomics, providing practical recommendations for researchers in the field. We have quantified several proteomic traits (ribosomal and photosynthetic proteomic proportions, regulatory cost) in eukaryotic and bacterial taxa, which can then be incorporated into trait-based models of microbial communities that reflect resource allocation strategies.
Methods
Samples were collected at the Antarctic sea ice edge in the Ross Sea, and metagenomic, metatranscriptomic, and metaproteomic analyses were conducted on each sample. Contained in this data submission are the metaproteomic bioinformatic pipeline output, database configurations, metaproteomic simulation output, cofragmentation bias analysis output, targeted proteomics data summaries, and culture proteomic data summaries.
Funding
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council, Award: RGPIN-2015-05009
Simons Foundation, Award: 504183
National Science Foundation
NSF-OCE, Award: 1756884
NSF-ANT, Award: 1043671
Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, Award: GBMF3828
NSF-OCE, Award: 1756884
NSF-ANT, Award: 1043671