Rapid responses of bees and butterflies but not birds to targeted urban road verge habitat enhancements
Data files
Mar 22, 2024 version files 7.35 KB
Abstract
Cities provide opportunities for biodiversity conservation through the design of urban greenspaces as wildlife habitat. A significant proportion of urban public land is narrow linear road verges, though their small size and harsh environmental conditions (e.g. high soil temperatures) may limit their ability to support plants and animals. We worked with a municipal government in a highly urbanised area to test whether conversion of standard road verges (e.g. lawn) to predominantly native understorey plants (forbs, grasses, and shrubs) selected for their abilities to tolerate harsh growing conditions and provide habitat increased the abundance and richness of bees, butterflies, and birds. We used a before-after-control-impact experiment and characterised temporal dynamics of biodiversity responses one year prior to planting and four years post planting. We also tested whether traits known to influence species responses to urbanisation (body size and feeding specialisation) mediated responses to road verge plantings. Bee species richness and abundance increased at experimental plantings in the first post-planting year and remained stable thereafter despite fluctuations at control sites. Butterfly abundance but not richness increased, and there was no evidence of bird responses to plantings. Larger bee species, which are known to be most negatively impacted by urbanisation, benefited more from the road verge plantings, while there was no effect of feeding specialisation. Bird and butterfly traits did not mediate responses to plantings.
Synthesis and applications: Road verges comprise a significant proportion of urban green spaces, and our results suggest that despite their small sizes and harsh environmental conditions they can provide habitat for bees and to a lesser extent butterflies. We demonstrated that habitat value can be rapidly enhanced by converting standard road verges to native understorey plants, and that these benefits may be greatest for the bee species most negatively impacted by urbanisation. Modifications such as additional plant species or wider verges may be required for urban road verges to provide habitat for a greater range of taxa including birds and butterflies.
README: Rapid responses of bees and butterflies but not birds to targeted urban road verge habitat enhancements
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.7m0cfxq33
These data comprise estimates of native bee, butterfly, and bird abundance and richness across 16 sites in Melbourne surveyed over four years, once before four of the sites received a habitat enhancement treatment and three times after the treatment.
Description of the data and file structure
The data is structured as follows:
Each row is a set of values measured (or estimated) for a single site in a single year, so there are 16 (sites) x 4 (years) = 64 rows.
Each column is a set of values for one variable across all site-by-year rows, including site name, survey year, biodiversity measures, landscape variables, and survey information (e.g. number of survey hours).
Variables are as follows:
site = the name of the site at which data were collected
tot.native.bee.abundance = the abundance of native bees summed across all species
native.bee.richness = the number of native bee species
native.bee.chao1 = the estimated number of native bee species, using the chao1 estimator
total.native.butterfly.abundance = the abundance of native butterflies summed across all species
native.butterfly.richness = the number of native butterfly species
native.butterfly.chao1 = the estimated number of native butterfly species, using the chao1 estimator
tot.native.bird.abundundance = the abundance of native butterflies summed across all species
native.bird.rich = the number of native bird species
native.bird.chao1 = the estimated number of native bird species, using the chao1 estimator
year = the year in which the data were collected
year.cat = year as a categorical variable
treatment = whether the site was subject to the biodiversity planting treatment (impact site) or not (control site)
prop.impervious.surface = the proportion of impervious surface (e.g. concrete, asphalt, buildings) cover with 200 m of the site
prop.canopy = the proportion of tree canopy cover within 200 m of the site (not used in the final analysis)
insect.survey.hrs = the total number of survey hours for bees and butterflies
bird.start.time.from5 = the start time of bird surveys as number of hours since 5 am
no.bird.surveys = the total number of bird surveys that were conducted
site.area = the area of the site in square meters