Data from: Killing and replacing queen-laid eggs: low cost of worker policing in the honeybee
Data files
Feb 14, 2014 version files 20.20 MB
-
exp. 1 excl. fem. data of col. f.csv
-
exp. 1 excl. fem. data of col. f.xls
-
exp. 1 incl. fem. data of col. f.csv
-
exp. 1 incl. fem. data of col. f.xls
-
exp. 2 for analysis.csv
-
exp. 2 for analysis.xls
-
exp. 2 for graph.csv
-
exp. 3.csv
-
exp. 3.xlsx
-
README_for_exp. 1 excl. fem. data of col. f.txt
-
README_for_exp. 1 incl. fem. data of col. f.txt
-
README_for_exp. 2 for analysis.txt
-
README_for_exp. 2 for graph.txt
-
README_for_exp. 3.txt
Abstract
Worker honeybees, Apis mellifera, police each other’s reproduction by killing worker-laid eggs. Previous experiments demonstrated that worker policing is effective, killing most (∼98%) worker-laid eggs. However, many queen-laid eggs were also killed (∼50%) suggesting that effective policing may have high costs. In these previous experiments, eggs were transferred using forceps into test cells, mostly into unrelated discriminator colonies. We measured both the survival of unmanipulated queen-laid eggs and the proportion of removal errors that were rectified by the queen laying a new egg. Across 2 days of the 3-day egg stage, only 9.6% of the queen-laid eggs in drone cells and 4.1% in worker cells were removed in error. When queen-laid eggs were removed from cells, 85% from drone cells and 61% from worker cells were replaced within 3 days. Worker policing in the honeybee has a high benefit to policing workers because workers are more related to the queen’s sons (brothers, r = 0.25) than sister workers’ sons (0.15). This study shows that worker policing also has a low cost in terms of the killing of queen-laid eggs, as only a small proportion of queen-laid eggs are killed, most of which are rapidly replaced.