Skip to main content
Dryad

Data from: Spatial–social familiarity complements the spatial–social interface: evidence from Yellowstone bison

Merkle, Jerod1; Poulin, Marie-Pier1; Caldwell, Molly1; Laforge, Michel1; Scholle, Anne1; Verzuh, Tana1; Geremia, Chris2

Published Aug 05, 2024 on Dryad. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.pzgmsbcws

Data files

Aug 05, 2024 version files 399.84 MB

Abstract

This dataset can be used to reproduce the results from Merkle et al. 2024, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. The abstract of that study is as follows. Social animals make behavioural decisions based on local habitat and conspecifics, as well as memoriszed past experience (i.e., ‘familiarity’) with habitat and conspecifics. Here, we develop a conceptual and empirical understanding of how spatial and social familiarity fit within the spatial-–social interface – —a novel framework integrating the spatial and social components of animal behaviour. We conducted a multi-scale analysis of the movements of GPS-collared plains bison (Bison bison, n = 66) residing in and around Yellowstone National Park, USA. We found that both spatial and social familiarity mediate how individuals respond to their spatial and social environments. For instance, individuals with high spatial familiarity rely on their own knowledge as opposed to their conspecifics’, and individuals with high social familiarity rely more strongly on the movement of conspecifics to guide their own movement. We also found that fine-scale spatial and social phenotypes often scale up to broad-scale phenotypes. For instance, bison that select more strongly to align with their nearest neighbour have larger home ranges. By integrating spatial and social familiarity into the spatial-–social interface, we demonstrate the utility of the interface for testing hypotheses, while also highlighting the pervasive importance of cognitive mechanisms in animal behaviour.